-
Glossary
- financial freedom
- accountability
- adaptability
- adaptive action
- ascii
- audit
- authentication
- authority
- benchmark
- business process
- business strategy
- cascading objectives
- character definition
- charismatic leadership
- codified knowledge
- cohesion
- commitment
- consensus
- context switching
- corrective action
- cost
- critical thinking
- culture
- cycle time
- decision
- decision analysis
- decision tree
- delegate
- direct influence
- distributed leadership
- eBook
- effect
- effective leadership
- emergent leadership
- emerging technologies
- encryption
- epub
- eReader
- essential outcomes
- ethical reasoning
- evaluation criteria
- experience
- forecast
- formalized process
- function
- Glossary and Acronym List
- granularity
- heuristic
- html
- hypothesis
- indirect influence
- initiatives
- inspect
- integrity
- intellectual capital
- intent
- interface
- IP
- ISO
- issue
- justification
- leadership
- legitimacy
- lesson learned
- management
- mentorship
- methodology
- mindmapping
- minimum viable quality
- mission statement
- model
- mutual influence
- objective
- PDCA
- perseverance
- pilot
- potential problem (or opportunity)
- principle
- prioritize
- problem
- procedure
- process
- process model
- project
- quality
- resilience
- responsibility
- responsiveness
- risk
- risk and opportunity management
- risk-based thinking
- rule of law
- schedule
- scope
- self-discipline
- service level
- socialization
- sound
- stakeholder
- strategic alignment
- strategy
- systems thinking
- tacit knowledge
- theory of constraints
- transactional leadership
- transformational leadership
- trust
- UML
- unicode
- value activities
- value chain
- values
- vision
- weighting
- work around
- Real Estate
- Lead Self
- Process
- Lead Teams
- Making a Website
- Lead Organizations
- Genealogy Consulting
-
Teaching Kids Leadership
- Problem Solving Checklist
- Adjusting Leader Style to Personality Types
- Plan Do Check Adjust (PDCA)
- So what can adults do to help kids learn leadership?
- A rose by any other name is still a rose
- Natural Consequences Versus Coaching and Correcting
- Help Kids Develop Improved People Skills
- Five Year Old Laments 'My sister is making me mad!'
- Socratic question-based discussions
- Have the child report on what they saw that day'
- Great question for the adults trying to teach kids
- Teach Kids How to Deal With Stress Well
- Teach Kids the Pareto Principle, the 80/20 Principle
- Maslov Pyramid Perspective on Kids
- Reading Partner Questions
- Watching Examples and Discussing with the Youth to Help Them Process What They Saw
- Trust is crucial to leadership
- Teenage Decision Making
- Character Development - What is character anyway so kids can develop it?
- Defining Leadership
- Blog Vocabulary Not at Child's Level
- Encouragement for the Single Parent
- Giving children opportunities to lead
- Habits of Mind from Project 2061
- Horizontal Leadership-There are more chances to practice this type for children
- How young is too young to start?
- Introduction for those new to leadership
- Producer or Consumer of Leadership?
- Scouts provides opportunities to practice leadership
- Set High Expectations
- So why should anyone take on the challenge of leadership?
- The Beginning of My Journey of Discovery
- The Paradox of Service to Others
- The Well Trained Mind
- Vertical Leadership is not where kids typically start out
- What about cultural differences?
- What can children pick up about leadership anyway?
- What is age-appropriate for teaching kids leadership?
- What is the Payoff for the Hard Work of Leadership?
- What lessons did I learn trying to develop leadership in my own children (so far)?
- Who cares about leadership?
- Character Development - How do we grow strong character and help children do the same?
- How do we measure our current character?
- Character Development - Fairness as a Character Trait
- Children Can Learn Leadership
-
Blog
- Gallons of Ink
- Got Yubikey Setup
- Experimenting with Ink Containers for Travel
- Cigar Case Pen Protector
- More Ink Mixing for Refill Bottles
- MacOS Sandboxing can Impact Reuse
- Python Programming
- Primary
- How to Make Family History Website and Book with Same Data
- Further Adventures Making DIY Fountain Pen Ink
- Cursive Writing
- Have Pens. Now I Need Paper
- eBook Conversion
- My Copper Metal Pen Arrived
- Do It Yourself (DIY) Mixing Fountain Pen Inks
- Microlearning
- Emergency Preparedness with Mobile Devices
- The Nature of Lisp and Writing with Pollen
- Fountain Pens
- Learning Simulation
- I Wish Familysearch.org Exported Data
- Raising Chickens in Florida
- Climbing the Learning Curve
- Gardening
- Dont Give Up
- The One Thing
- Opportunity Management
- Quote About Questions
- Mindset - Be sure you encourage kids toward 'growth' not 'born talent' with its fixed limits
- Demonstrating Respect and Choice versus Force and Coercion
- Behavioral Styles
- Applying Precepts
-
Family History
- Author's Contact Information
- Conventions Used
- Family History
- Family History Frontmatter
- Family History Introduction
- Historical Timeline
- Note to Future Family History Maintainers
-
Our Lanham Paternal Lineage
- Josias Lanham Family 1628 (Not our direct line)
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the Curtis Harden Lanham Generation
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the Hiram D. Lanham Generation
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the John Lanham (1661) Generation
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the Jonathon Lanham (1630) Generation
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the O.S. Lanham Generation
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the Robert Lanham (1560) Generation
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the Sylvester Lanham Generation
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the T.B. Lanham Generation
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the Thomas Lanham (1701) Generation
- Other Siblings and Cousins in the Thomas Lanham (1757) Generation
- Our Lanham Line - The Paternal Lineage
- The Amanda Francis Lanham Family
- The Andrew Shepherd Family
- The Archibald Lanham Family 1751
- The Benjamin Garfield Lanham Family
- The Burress and Ida Roberts Family
- The Calvin Powell Dorsey Family
- The Charles Selby Family 1762
- The Clifford Wayne Lanham Family
- The Curtis Harden Lanham Family 1813
- The Curtis Harden Lanham Family 1875
- The David Lanham Family 1595
- The Edward James Holt Family
- The Edward Lanham Family 1685
- The Elmer Harn Family
- The Emmitt F. Welborn Family
- The Eugene WILLIAMS Family 1855
- The Frank Robinson Family
- The Gideon Wilburn Ashley Family
- The Hiram Demarcus Lanham Family 1845
- The Issac Elam Family 1803
- The Jacob Shepherd Family 1812
- The James Bedford Ray Family (Cliffie M. Lanham)
- The James Kennedy Family
- The Jasper Shipman Family
- The Jeremiah Lanham Family 1755
- The Jesse Elam Family 1782
- The Joe A. Madden Family
- The John Hendrickson Corely Family
- The John James Roberts Family
- The John Lanham Family 1661
- The John Lanham Family 1690
- The John Nicholas Jacks Family 1740
- The John T. Scott Family
- The Jonathan Hammer Cook Family
- The Jonathan Lanham Family 1630
- The Josias Lanham Family 1590
- The Oran Stroud Lanham Family 1916
- The R.J. Craighead Family 1907
- The R.J. Craighead Family 1907
- The Richard Lanham Family 1697
- The Robert Lanham Family 1584
- The Roger Lanham Family 1560
- The Stephen Lanham (1726) Family
- The Stephen Lanham Family 1760
- The Stephen Lanham Family 1784
- The Sylvester Lanham Family 1790
- The Thomas Benton Lanham Family
- The Thomas Berry (T. B.) Lanham Family 1882
- The Thomas Lanham (1757) Family
- The Thomas Lanham Family 1700 or 1701
- The Thomas Sisk Family 1858
- The W.T. Lanham Family 1850
- The Walter Lee Ray Family
- The William Curtis Lanham Family
- The William Lanham Family 1699
- The Willie Green Scott Family
- The Wortha Leon Lanham Family 1907
- Reference Materials
- Rockwall Cemetery Listing, Rockwall, Texas
- The 2006 Journey to Find Thomas Lanham's Grave Site
- The Lanham family of Wortham (Research Details)
-
The Maternal Side of Our Family Lines
- The A. Sion Wheeles Family
- The Aaron Jones Family
- The Abednego Chandler Family 1752
- The Adrian Alford Colbath Family 1893
- The Alex L. Baker Family
- The Alford Nolen Jones Family
- The Andrew Jackson (Jack) Kitchens Family
- The Beall Family
- The Benjamin Colbath Family 1758
- The Chisel True Baker Family
- The Daniel Horne Blackmore Family
- The David Amick Family
- The George Henry Slattery Family
- The J. E. Sisk Family
- The James McHale Family
- The John C. Colbath Family 1820
- The John Chandler Family
- The John Jones Family
- The John Lacey Family (bef 1778)
- The John Patrick Carmody Family
- The John Sappington Family 1723
- The Larkin (Lark) Patrick Williams Family
- The Lazarus Rufus Jones Family
- The Leah Unknown Family
- The Luther Jason Head Family
- The Luther Troup Baker Family
- The Mason Jones Family
- The Michael Gonzales Family
- The Michael Yost Family
- The Patrick Joseph Merrick Family
- The Patrick Merrick Family 1883
- The Patrick Williams Family
- The Perry Rufus Jones Family
- The Peter Logan Yost Family
- The Quirke Family
- The Richard Head Family 1802
- The Richard Merrick Family
- The Robert Chandler Family 1687
- The Stephen Grey Family 1894
- The Thomas Edmonson Head Family
- The Thomas Lacey Family 1808
- The Thomas Winthrop Colbath Family 1851
- The William Estes Family 1785
- The William J. Roberts Family
- The William Milton Jacks Family
- The William Patrick Williams Family
- The Willis Ashley Family
- The Winthrop Colbath Family 1786
- The Time and the Places
- Mental Models
- Contact
- Frequently Asked Questions
Learning Simulation
The simulation field does not explain simulation well to beginners or newbies.
Many technical fields have this issue. The curse of knowledge affects technical fields. On knowledge scale of A-Z the experts are at X, Y, or Z, newbies at A or B. Newbies may not know enough to focus on why the Euler method is not best for differential equations initially.
Since many simulation practitioners are consultants, perhaps there is a disincentive to share. Perhaps many practitioners think sharing how will lower the barrier of entry for potential competitors.
Universities only share a few basics, typically. Many give the same old bank teller lines example. There are little to no gradually increasing difficulty and complexity examples with explanation to help newbies. It seems like these courses were only teaching a knowledge survey of simulation approaches and tools and don’t have time to build practical skills in the students that can be used on the job.
One professor publishes his own book on how to learn simulation using python, but to make it easier on his students he added his own library that does not translate well to commercial use.
Simulation tool vendors offer “free” versions for students that commercial newbies cannot use legally. Such free tools drain away people willing to show how to do simulation with a regular programming language. It is much easier if you have such an expensive tool to just use it. Tools like Arena, AnyLogic, and Simul8 are great for personal use, but then the tool becomes a dependency that a commercial newbie may not be able to make a sufficient business case for the licensing cost without some previous success to show on a small scale. This is a catch twenty two that slows adoption.
These tools cost thousands of U.S. dollars for commercial use. This makes sense if you are a simulation shop. However, this is very challenging to make a business case when trying to apply simulation to a business situation when there is no existing group to reach out to inside the organization.
Low cost, small scale experiments are not aided by a $5,000+ tool.
Regular programming languages are typically free (i.e. Python, Ruby, Java). But there are not many non-trivial examples available on how to create a simulation from scratch using a regular programming language, growing in complexity.
Some languages have existing simulation libraries, but these libraries are designed for advanced simulation practitioners, not newbies. Their documentation typically does not explain why, only how, assuming you already know why. For example, SimPy assumes you already know how to use Discrete Event Simulation. The documentation is aimed at knowledgeable practitioners, without much support for newbies explaining why.
The simulation community argues that they avoid regular programming languages because some practitioners do not know how to code. Yet software is eating the world. Many of the same principles of good software development apply to simulation too.
There are some modeling languages, such as Modelica and SysML. Modelica is challenging because it is not like other programming languages. Running modelica models is not as simple as running a java command line app. SysML is visual, and does not seem to easily convert to a form that can be simulated.
So how to learn simulation for beginners?
If you can find a mentor or tutor, that is a terrific short cut.
First commit to learning it. Be clear on the value of learning it. Be willing to work hard. When mentally fatigued, or thinking you can’t do it, take a break and come back fresh another time. Get 7+ hours of sleep before working on learning hard things. When you hit a wall learning some element of simulation, stop and take a break. I’ve taken a break for a few weeks sometimes on learning really hard subjects. It helps.
Learn in iterations in short chunks of time. Use a pomodoros application as a focus timer, or an actual kitchen timer that looks like a tomato. This little by little approach allows your brain to absorb better. It also avoids you burning out or yielding to negative self-talk that says “You can’t do this!” You can. Hard problems take time to master. Stay at it.
Recognize that your subconscious is still at work while you are doing other things, eating away at the problem you conscious brain told it to solve. You have to give your subconscious time to work by focusing on other things periodically and not forcing it.
Reward yourself for small gains. Learning hard things takes much effort. Celebrate small incremental gains along the way to help you stay motivated. “Yay, I did this small step!” also helps fight off the feeling of “I can’t do this,” that we all sometimes feel.
Be patient. Think of a few other hard things you learned previously. Think about how long it took you to master it. Now give yourself permission to spend a similar amount of time mastering simulation. If you give in to impatience, then you end up with a learning curve that looks more like a cliff face in front of you and that just feeds the negative voice crying “Give up, you can’t do this.” Take it a step at a time, like some simulations progress in steps.
You do not need 10,000 to learn to apply simulation in a basic way. But it also will not happen like a television episode with everything neatly wrapped up in one hour. Plan on many hours because simulation is a deep field. To be an expert, perhaps 10,000 hours is better.
At the beginning you do not realize how much there is to learn. That is okay because it helps avoid feeling overwhelmed. As you learn, you will learn there is more that you did not know. Learn the portion you are learning well enough to explain it to a child or someone closer to the novice end of the expertise continuum that you have now become. If you can’t do it without having to look things up, practice some more until this part sticks in your head. Teaching someone else helps you really get it too.
Identify a real problem you want to solve. This will help you as you learn to notice what will help solve this problem. Sometimes those that teach things try to cover all of it, rather than stop and apply this portion. You may learn better only learning a part of simulation that applies to your problem first. Then iterate and learn the next part of the problem. Avoid starting out with the most complex problem you can think of as the first problem to tackle with simulation. This is akin to shooting yourself in the foot.
Engineering is about designing under constraints. Picking a real problem constrains your learning to a subset needed to solve a problem. Solving the problem will increase your confidence in this new endeavor of simulation. Study different resources. Search for resources. Pick one and study it. Try to apply it. As you learn, later searches get better because you begin to learn the terminology used by the practitioners. You find more resources that seemed hidden before you knew what to look for and what to ask the search engine.
Tom Johnson recommends asking questions about the subject. He picks 10 questions and then goes and learns the answers. If this method helps you learn simulation, apply it.
Build a conceptual mind map of your current mental model about simulation. Map out what you have learned as you learn it. Human brains are wired for visual inputs. Mind maps visually show the relationships between the concepts as you’re learning them. As you iteratively add to the mind map, you also reinforce prior learning by seeing it again over time intervals. This helps your brain make the knowledge stick. It helps build a conceptual framework.
Someone once described this as giving ideas a place to land in your head like an airplane needs a runway to land. Such a mind map allows you to more easily see things you need to learn next as you are more clear on the gaps in your knowledge. Mind map tools allow you to move things around easily. As you iteratively refine your understanding, you can move things around as you deepen your knowledge, understanding, and application strategies. I sometime find I have to refine or correct my original perspective as I go. Mind maps may also help you avoid the curse of knowledge. The mind map may help you teach someone else how to apply simulation so you can pass it forward.
Spend time on your design with a pen and paper first. Think of the real process manually at first. Consider the simulation elements required and why. Read the manuals by Arena, Simul8, and AnyLogic for the introduction to simulation portions. These are much better than many of the academic papers for explaining simulation to newbies in regular English without all the passive voice.
Caution
|
These manuals are about their tool. If you don’t plan to use their tool yet, be clear about when their manual stops being helpful conceptually. |
Decompose the relevant system elements. For example, all technologies involve control. The essence of control to compare what is happening to what we want to happen and make adjustments.[1] Understand what control elements are needed in simulation generally and in your problem space specifically. What entities are needed to simulate your problem? Think of the real world physical system or the abstracted virtual system. UML tools work for this too, if you know how to use them.
Build a modular model using hierarchical layered composition. This makes it easier to implement / code your model into smaller testable pieces. It also allows for potential reuse later. Most STEM educational backgrounds will cover breaking a system down into smaller chunks. I’m calling those chunks modules.
Run small tests on the manual prototype. By hand if necessary to be clear in your own mental model.
If you do not already know a programming language, pick one that is easy to learn. Python is easy to learn and has a large community that has answered many questions by newbies. Then code it. Having a clear design mental model will help debug the code.
Practice until comfort level is obtained
Start to read the literature of the simulation community.
Repeat. Work a slightly more complex problem. Grow your skills.
Aim to concisely communicate the benefits and ROI as a business case.
Good luck. Share your journey.